Author: News Editor

Editorial Management . Corporate Communications . Media Resource Strategy . Product Positioning . Partnership Development . Digital Marketing . oludare.richards@gmail.com

Ulez expanded to include whole of outer London

The Ultra Low Emission Zone (Ulez) has been expanded to include all of London’s boroughs.

Drivers must pay a charge of £12.50 per day to drive a non-compliant vehicle anywhere in the zone under the controversial clean-air plan.

A £160m scrappage scheme is still available for all Londoners to claim from, with a maximum of £2,000 being offered per vehicle.

Small businesses, sole traders and charities are included in the scheme.

Drivers must pay £12.50 if they enter the Ulez zone with a non-compliant car

To monitor the new zone, Transport for London (TfL) said it would install 2,750 cameras across outer London. As of mid-August 1,900 cameras had been erected, almost 70% of the total number planned.

Meanwhile, the Met Police has received hundreds of reports of criminal damage being done to cameras, with more than 300 of them either vandalised or stolen.

Nevertheless, TfL’s director of transport strategy and policy, Christina Calderato, insisted the transport authority was “ready” for the expansion.

Ms Calderato also recommended people signed-up to an Auto Pay account on TfL’s website, where drivers are automatically charged so they “will never receive a PCN (penalty charge notice)”.

Those driving in the zone in a non-compliant car must pay the £12.50 charge online or by phone up to three days after they travelled.

The penalty for not paying is set at £180, which goes down to £90 if it is paid within 14 days.

A number of protests have been held about the expansion

According to Sadiq Khan: “We now have a really effective policy to reduce air pollution.

“It’s shown to be effective in central London and inner London, but I think clean air is a right not a privilege.”

The mayor said more than 15,000 applications had been made to the Ulez scrappage scheme in the past week.

Since the announcement was made about the expansion in 2022, it has been met with opposition by some politicians and motorists.

Five Conservative councils took the policy to the High Court but lost after the judge ruled the mayor’s expansion decision “was within his powers”.

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said the expanded scheme was going to “hit working families”.

“I don’t think that’s the right priority, I don’t think that’s the right thing to do and I wish they hadn’t done it,” he added.

Members of Mr Khan’s own party were also hesitant to support the policy after Labour lost the by-election in Boris Johnson’s former seat of Uxbridge and Ruislip.

At the time, Labour leader Keir Starmer refused to say whether he backed the Ulez expansion, and told the BBC the mayor should “reflect” on the policy.

The Conservative mayoral candidate Susan Hall has pledged to reverse the Ulez expansion if she is elected mayor in May 2024.

The BBC said it has assessed some of the claims made about the policy to better understand its impact.

 

 

Culled from BBC

The Bank of Mum and Dad is dragging down Britain’s economy

The UK may be perilously close to a recession, businesses may be closing and the city may be deep in the doldrums, but there is one segment of the finance industry that’s still booming. No matter the economic headwinds, the Bank of Mum and Dad seems to do booming business nonetheless.

According to statistics released this week, relatives are funding a higher proportion of property purchases than ever before. This year, the total amount of such lending is expected to reach £8bn, and then grow again to £10bn by 2025. At this rate, I wouldn’t blink if it reached £20bn or more by the end of the decade.

But while it’s easy enough to understand why parents want to help their children, the increasing importance of the familial hand-out is contributing to huge divides in society, draining retirement resources and helping to further tie up capital that could be used more productively.

The Bank of Mum and Dad, and the housing market that gives rise to it, is becoming a huge drag on the economy. The only way we can fix this is by finally summoning up the political will to build more houses.

Parents – and the occasional wealthy aunt or uncle for the very lucky – have been helping to get young people started on the property ladder for generations. Yet until relatively recently, that hand up was seen as something restricted to the wealthy upper-middle classes, not dissimilar to sending children to private schools.

While parental assistance might have been a bit more common than that – between a quarter and a fifth of buyers from 1970 to 2004 had help from their parents – it certainly wasn’t the norm. After all, very few people had a spare £10,000 or so lying around to help a kid or two buy their first home.

Over the last two decades, however, that has changed. Family help to buy has become a completely critical component of the property market, and by extension the wider economy as well.

In 2023, relatives are expected to contribute some £8.1bn to help young people buy properties. That money will help close almost half of all purchases by the under 55s, with total lending up 50pc on 2020 and the average sum given reaching almost £26,000.

Large chunks of the British property market seem now to be dependent on intergenerational transfers to keep moving. Take that away, and things will seize up.

It’s not particularly hard to understand why it’s happening. There’s nothing more natural in the world than wanting to help your children or grandchildren get on in life. It’s usually a force for good, motivating people to build up capital, and look after it sensibly.

And at least it recycles some of the £8.7 trillion the UK has locked up in housing wealth – £7 trillion after mortgage debts – between generations.

Yet we also shouldn’t kid ourselves that there’s anything healthy or natural about an economy that has become utterly dependent on older relatives doling out chunks of money. In fact, there are three big problems with the dominance of the Bank of Mum and Dad.

First, it’s contributing to an increasingly wide divide in society between those who can and those who can’t afford to buy property. If one half of the population is getting £26,000 handouts for the deposit on their first home while the other half is not, then huge numbers of people will be finding themselves locked out of homeownership. There is nothing to be celebrated about that.

As Mrs Thatcher quite rightly recognised back in the 1980s, homeownership is not just about having a place to live. It creates a stake in a prosperous, free market economy, it encourages hard work and responsibility and it allows people to build up personal wealth.

Anyone who holds down a steady job should be able to buy a home. If we restrict it to people with well-off grandparents or parents, we will destroy aspiration and ambition.

Next, it drains retirement savings. People are living longer, and medical treatments are getting more and more expensive, while the triple-lock on pensions has become a bigger and bigger strain on the public finances.

And yet at precisely the time when we should be making sure older people can look after themselves financially we are using their money to keep the property market afloat.

Many people look into equity release loans on their own homes in order to help their children buy theirs. In turn, that may well mean having no money left to pay for a care home. It is crazy.

Finally, and perhaps worst of all, it continues the cycle of locking up capital in housing, when we could be directing investment towards the real economy instead.

Just imagine the impact it would have on the British economy if the £8bn going towards buying apartments were directed to entrepreneurs or small businesses looking to scale up their operations? Instead, all we’re doing is keeping house prices artificially high.

The Left will no doubt soon start arguing that we need restrictions on the Bank of Mum and Dad, arguing for controls on gifts, or even more plausibly trying to replace inheritance tax with a levy on any capital transferred from one person to another. All that will do is make the problem even worse.

The real issue is the UK’s dysfunctional property market, which has become a huge drag on both the economy and society, and the only fix for that is to finally start to build more homes.

We may well have to start contemplating some genuinely radical changes to make that happen: rethinking the green belt would be a good start, so that we can expand our most productive cities; so would scrapping judicial review for planning to prevent local activists from using the courts to delay projects for years; and mandating local councils to free up a lot more land for development, and to do so a lot more quickly.

However it gets done, until the UK works out how to unblock its planning system and start building more it will be impossible to start growing again – and the Bank of Mum and Dad will keep on getting raided.

 

Culled from The Telegraph

ECOWAS explains stance on military intervention

Four weeks after its seven-day ultimatum issued to the leaders of the Niger junta to restore constitutional order, the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) has further explained some phrases in its communique.

President of ECOWAS Commission, Dr Omar Alieu Touray, during a press conference at the ECOWAS Commission’s Headquarters in Abuja, assured citizens of Niger that ECOWAS is very interested in their economic prosperity and social welfare and believes that their aspirations can only be met through democratic means and participatory governance.

President Touray emphasised that ECOWAS is working towards an amicable solution to restore constitutional order in the Republic of Niger.

According to Touray, the regional organization has not announced any intention to engage in warfare against the citizens of Niger Republic, neither has it formulated strategies to invade the nation.

He noted that some influential people in the region had promoted the misrepresentation of the planned invasion of Niger by the ECOWAS Standby Force saying, that deployment of ECOWAS Standby Force is provided in the ECOWAS Protocol in the advent of an unconstitutional change of government in any member country.

Dr. Touray, further said that the Mechanism of the ECOWAS Protocol provides that force can be deployed in the event of an overthrow or at an attempt to remove a democratically elected government.

How pilots handle flying the Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird at 3,540 km/h?

The Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird was a remarkable aircraft that could fly at speeds over Mach 3.2 and at altitudes up to 85,000 feet. It was the fastest manned aircraft ever flown and still holds many speed, altitude, and distance records for a manned aircraft.

Flying in such an extreme environment required special training and equipment for the pilots. The pilots of the SR-71 wore full-pressure suits that resembled those worn by astronauts. The suits protected them from low pressure, low temperature, and lack of oxygen at high altitudes. They also provided protection in case of an emergency ejection.

The pilots also had to cope with the high g-forces and acceleration that resulted from flying at such high speeds. The SR-71 could accelerate from Mach 1 to Mach 3 in less than 15 minutes, which put a lot of stress on the human body. The pilots had to undergo rigorous physical training and medical examinations to ensure they were fit for the mission. They also had to use special techniques to breathe and move their limbs during high-g maneuvers.

The pilots also experienced a unique sensation of speed when flying the SR-71. They could see the curvature of the Earth and the stars in broad daylight. They could also see the shock waves forming around the aircraft as it broke the sound barrier. The SR-71 flew so fast that it could outrun any missile or enemy aircraft that tried to intercept it. The pilots had to rely on their instruments and their instincts to navigate and control the aircraft.

Niger: Paris backs ‘president Bazoum’ and ‘ECOWAS’ military action should it be the case’

Macron has insisted that France would not change position in condemning the coup and offered support to Mohamed Bazoum and ECOWAS.

Niamey and Paris’ differences seem irreconcilable. During a major foreign policy speech to ambassadors in Paris, Monday (Aug. 28), French president Emmanuel Macron doubled down on his government’s line regarding the junta.

“Our policy is the right one. It depends on the courage of President Mohamed Bazoum, the commitment of our diplomats, of our ambassador on the ground who is remaining despite pressure,” Macron told a gathering of French ambassadors in the capital on Monday.

French Ambassador Sylvain Itte was ordered to leave Niger within 48 hours in a letter Friday (Aug. 25) from the Nigerien Foreign Ministry that accused him of ignoring an invitation for a meeting with the ministry. The letter also cited “actions of the French government contrary to the interests of Niger.”

Niger’s President Bazoum was toppled on July 26. France, the Economic Community of West African States and the UN among others have called for him to be reinstated.

“We do not recognize the putschists, we support a president who has not resigned, who we remain committed to. And we support the diplomatic action and, military action should it be the case, of ECOWAS, within a partnership approach which is the one I presented last February, ” the French head of state said.

The de facto ruling CNSP have since the coup appointed a new government. Coup leader general Abdourahmane Tiani said the CNSP will return Niger to democratic rule within 3 years as he announced a national dialogue on Aug. 19 .

Although it is considering a more diplomatic channel for resolution, ECOWAS has hit the nation with sanctions, threatening to send troops.

A spokesman for the French military on August 10 said that any cooperation with Niger in the fields of development and financial aid and military partnerships had been suspended until further notice.

Ulez: What is it and why is its expansion controversial?

The expansion of London’s Ultra Low Emission Zone (Ulez) has been a point of contention amongst both politicians and the public.

The High Court has now ruled that expansion of the zone is lawful, after five Conservative-run councils had challenged the Labour mayor of London’s plans.

It was also a big issue in the Uxbridge and South Ruislip by-election.

 

What is Ulez and why is it controversial?

A £12.50 daily charge applies for driving in the Ultra Low Emission Zone, commonly referred to as Ulez, if the vehicle doesn’t meet certain emission standards.

Boris Johnson decided to introduce it when he was the Mayor of London. It then came into effect in April 2019. By this time, Labour’s Sadiq Khan had become Mayor.

Initially it covered the same central area as the Congestion Zone, before widening out to the North and South Circular roads in 2021.

In November 2022, a further expansion to cover all London boroughs was confirmed. This is due to start on 29 August 2023.

Ulez expansion map

The mayor’s office said the expansion was needed to tackle air pollution, congestion and the climate emergency.

Some other UK cities have their own, different clean air zones.

Why are such zones introduced?

Low emission zones have been introduced to clean up the air, with the aim of making people healthier and reducing the burden on the NHS.

Petrol and diesel vehicles emit the CO2 that warms our planet, but this scheme is principally aimed not at fighting climate change but reducing levels of two key air pollutants – nitrogen dioxide (NOx) and fine particulate matter (PM2.5).

Those pollutants have been blamed for causing thousands of premature deaths and stunting the growth of children’s lungs.

What scrappage schemes are available?

For the London Ulez expansion, £160m in total has been set aside for a scrappage scheme.

The scheme was initially open to people on low incomes or disability benefits, some very small businesses and London-based charities.

However, that scheme will be extended to all Londoners from 21 August 2023.

Anyone with an eligible vehicle who lives in one of the 32 London boroughs or the City of London will be able to apply to scrap a car or motorcycle, Transport for London has said.

Eligible drivers can get up to £2,000 for scrapping a car. The amount of money on offer differs for vans and motorbikes.

Changes to the scheme’s criteria were made in June and August.

There is also a grace period for small businesses and charities who have already ordered a new compliant van or minibus, or booked retro-fitting.

How do I know if my car is Ulez compliant?

Transport for London has an online ‘Check your vehicle’ tool where people can enter their number plate and the country where their car was registered to see whether they will need to pay the £12.50 per day Ulez charge.

Cars need to meet minimum emissions standards to avoid paying the charge.

Petrol cars generally meet the standards if they were first registered after 2005, while diesel cars generally have to be newer than September 2015.

When does Ulez expand?

The scheme is due to expand to cover all London boroughs from 29 August.

Transport for London has a map showing where it will operate and a tool to check which postcodes will be covered.

Why is Ulez controversial?

The latest expansion of Ulez has proved divisive. Clean air campaigners support it.

However, some residents, businesses and politicians have expressed serious concerns. They include the financial impact during a cost of living squeeze, and the nine month-long notice period.

Some people affected say the scrappage scheme won’t help them. The cost of second-hand Ulez-compliant cars has also risen.

Five Conservative-run councils launched legal action over the decision to expand Ulez, although the High Court dismissed their challenge. There have also been public protests.

The mayor has defended the plan, arguing it is necessary to help prevent health conditions related to air pollution and even excess deaths. Preparations such as installing cameras have continued.

Has the existing London Ulez made any difference?

The number of older polluting vehicles that have entered the Ulez has fallen dramatically with 97% now meeting the cleaner standards.

Within that area it is estimated that NOx emissions have fallen by 26% since 2019 with PM2.5 emissions falling by 19% over the same period.

Air quality has improved as a result but all Londoners still live in areas exceeding World Health Organization guidelines for both pollutants.

Do other countries in Europe have similar schemes?

There are low emission zones in a number of European countries, and they vary by vehicle type and emissions.

Italy has the most zones in Europe – some of them permanent, many seasonal – followed by Germany, according to the Urban Access Regulations website. In Paris, a zero emission zone is planned for 2030.

 

Culled from BBC

Notting Hill: Revellers dance in fabulous feather outfits as they hit the streets for famous carnival

The streets of West London were awash with colour as dancers made the most of the fine weather for the Children’s Day Parade.

Revellers were covered in paint and flour at the start of the two-day event. Credit: © Jeff Moore

The Notting Hill event, held over the August Bank Holiday is Europe’s largest street carnival and celebrates Caribbean culture and history.

Some dancers wore brightly-coloured wings as they took part in the parade. Credit: EPA

One group of dancers wore Phoenix-like wings on their backs, while another group were decked out in all-red outfits and third group wore eye-catching flamboyant dresses.

A dancer wore this eye-catching outfit complete with huge feathers. Credit: EPA

Those who had come to watch and soak up the party atmosphere were soon covered in paint and flour as they took part in J’ouvert, the traditional opening to the two-day event.

A cop joins in the fun and sprays paint during the traditional J’ouvert opening. Credit: Reuters

It’s been projected that two million people will attend the two day event.

South Korean tech bosses fret about a flood of cheap Chinese robot waiters

South Korean restaurants are using AI robots to cope with labor shortages.

Robots made in China are vastly cheaper than those from South Korea. There are fears that the cut-price competition could hit Korea’s robotics industry.

Tech executives in South Korea are concerned that a flood of cheap Chinese robots is undermining their own attempts to sell their own devices, a report says.

South Korea has embraced robot waiters in restaurants as a response to labor shortages caused in part by a demographic crisis.

Data from the Korean Association of Robot Industry shared with the Financial Times showed there were 5,000 server robots in Korean restaurants.

According to an April report in the Korea Times, one owner placed tablets on every table in his restaurants to eliminate the need for waiters.

During the pandemic, Reuters reported that South Korean tech company KT Corp started selling “Aglio Kim” – a trolley-like AI robot to restaurants.

It can carry food for as many as four tables on each trip, Lee Young-jin of KT told the news agency.

However, tech executives in South Korea told the FT they’re now concerned the market is being flooded by cheap Chinese robots, stymying the country’s own robotics makers.

Server tech has become more sophisticated in recent years, moving beyond tablets on tables to fully autonomous robots collecting orders and delivering food.

One Chinese-made serving robot costs 10 million to 30 million won ($7,500 to $22,600) – about a fifth of the price of Korean equivalents, the newspaper reported.

One unnamed executive told the FT said they were trying to win the battle with better-quality robots, “but this is not easy.”

Korean companies are looking for ways to compete with cheap Chinese goods more broadly as well. Aju Korea Daily reported in May that South Korean startups were offering restaurants robots to rent for 300,000 won a month.

However, some in the industry think subsidies will be needed to compete with Chinese imports.

 

Culled from the Business Insider

American authorities probing roughly 5,000 pilots suspected of withholding major health details

Veterans Affairs investigators discovered that thousands of American pilots may have falsified their medical history.sharrocks/Getty Images

Federal officials are probing roughly 5,000 pilots suspected of withholding major health issues, per The Washington Post.

Veterans Affairs investigators stumbled on the health record inconsistencies over two years ago.

Some veterans who have been temporarily grounded feel as though they’re being singled out.

Federal authorities have been probing roughly 5,000 pilots who officials believe may have falsified their medical records to hide that they were earning benefits for significant health issues that could imperil their ability to fly safely, The Washington Post reported.

The pilots who have had their records examined are military veterans who informed the Federal Aviation Administration that they were suitable to fly, but didn’t disclose that they were also receiving veterans benefits for various disabilities that could prevent them from effectively sitting in a pilot’s seat.

Veterans Affairs investigators stumbled on the record inconsistencies over two years ago, but the FAA had not publicly disclosed many aspects of the investigation, according to The Post.

FAA spokesman Matthew Lehner told The Post that the agency had been probing around 4,800 pilots “who might have submitted incorrect or false information as part of their medical applications” and indicated that roughly half of the cases were closed. The spokesman also said 60 pilots who “posed a clear danger to aviation safety” were — for the moment — barred from the cockpit while their records were being looked over by officials.

Nearly 600 of the pilots who are being probed have licenses to fly the general public on passenger airlines, according to individuals with knowledge of the cases who spoke to The Post.

Many of the other pilots possess commercial licenses, which gives them ability to be hired to fly for a range of clients.

Pilots have to pass regular health screenings, but according to The Post, the tests are often not always comprehensive. And the FAA is reliant on pilots disclosing conditions that officials may not be able to pinpoint, including depression or post-traumatic stress, according to doctors who spoke to the newspaper and oversee the exams.

According to The Post, some veterans have downplayed their health conditions to the FAA in efforts to retain their eligibility to fly, while also inflating the severity their health conditions to the Veterans Administration in order to boost their disability payments.

Some pilots have been grounded while investigators review their medical history to the FAA.d3sign/Getty Images

Thousands of pilots may be risks to the “flying public”

The Post obtained records that reveal the FAA’s Office of Aerospace Medicine since last year has set aside $3.6 million to bring onboard medical staffers to conduct additional reviews of certification records for 5,000 pilots who might present “potential risks to the flying public.”

Officials at the Department of Transportation declined to comment to The Post regarding the report.

“The FAA used a risk-based approach to identify veterans whose medical conditions posed the greatest risk to safety and instructed them to cease flying while the agency reviews their cases,” the FAA’s Lehner said in a statement. “The vast majority of these pilots may continue to operate safely while we complete the reconciliation process.”

In some of the closed cases, pilots have been told to resubmit more accurate records and sit for new health exams, while some have been unable to fly until they’re cleared by the FAA, according to Lehner and lawyers for affected pilots.

And the VA inspector general’s office is now probing some of the 4,800 pilots and will look into whether the Department of Justice should be involved in individual cases regarding potential benefits fraud, according to two individuals who knowledge of the subject who spoke with The Post.

For two decades, the FAA has been aware that thousands of pilots may have been flying with significant health ailments, but transportation officials pushed back against calls for more substantial background checks for pilots, according to The Post.

The FAA review has also brought about an array of criticism from military veterans who feel as though the probes haven’t been applied equally.

“If they’re going to shine a light on veterans, they need to shine a light everywhere,” former Army pilot Rick Mangini told The Post.

Mangini has been unable to fly for his position at a cargo company after his medical certificate lapsed last month; he had not revealed a sleep apnea condition, for which he received benefits from the VA.

While Mangini disclosed on his application that he was receiving disability benefits, he told The Post that he didn’t know he had to detail his condition.

“I know of a lot of pilots who have told me about [medical conditions] they aren’t telling the FAA about,” he said. “What they’re doing to veterans? That’s the definition of harassment.”

 

 

 

Culled from Business Insider

Japan’s X-ray satellite and ‘Moon Sniper’ lunar lander are ready to launch

A revolutionary satellite that will reveal celestial objects in a new light and the “Moon Sniper” lunar lander are expected to lift off Sunday night.

The Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency launch, already rescheduled twice due to bad weather, will occur aboard an H-IIA rocket from the Tanegashima Space Center at 8:26 p.m. ET Sunday, or 9:26 a.m. Japan Standard Time on Monday.

The event will stream live on JAXA’s YouTube channel, offering a broadcast in both English and Japanese. The live stream will begin at 7:55 p.m. ET Sunday.

The XRISM satellite (pronounced “crism”), also called the X-Ray Imaging and Spectroscopy Mission, is a joint mission between JAXA and NASA, along with participation from the European Space Agency and Canadian Space Agency.

Along for the ride is JAXA’s SLIM, or Smart Lander for Investigating Moon. This small-scale exploration lander is designed to demonstrate a “pinpoint” landing at a specific location within 100 meters (328 feet), rather than the typical kilometer range, by relying on high-precision landing technology. The precision led to the mission’s nickname, Moon Sniper.

The satellite and its two instruments will observe the universe’s hottest regions, largest structures and objects with the strongest gravity, according to NASA. XRISM will detect X-ray light, a wavelength invisible to humans.

Studying stellar explosions and black holes

X-rays are released by some of the most energetic objects and events in the universe, which is why astronomers want to study them.

“Some of the things we hope to study with XRISM include the aftermath of stellar explosions and near-light-speed particle jets launched by supermassive black holes in the centers of galaxies,” said Richard Kelley, XRISM principal investigator at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, in a statement. “But of course, we’re most excited about all the unexpected phenomena XRISM will discover as it observes our cosmos.”

Compared with other wavelengths of light, X-rays are so short that they pass through the dish-shaped mirrors that observe and collect visible, infrared and ultraviolet light such as the James Webb and Hubble space telescopes.

With that in mind, XRISM has thousands of curved individual nested mirrors better designed to detect X-rays. The satellite will need to calibrate for a few months once it reaches orbit. The mission is designed to operate for three years.

The satellite can detect X-rays that have energies ranging from 400 to 12,000 electron volts, which is far beyond the energy of visible light at 2 to 3 electron volts, according to NASA. This range of detection will allow for studying cosmic extremes across the universe.

XRISM contains two special mirror arrays to detect X-rays. – Taylor Mickal/NASA

The satellite carries two instruments called Resolve and Xtend. Resolve tracks tiny temperature shifts that help it determine the source, composition, motion and physical state of X-rays. Resolve operates at minus 459.58 degrees Fahrenheit (minus 273.10 degrees Celsius), a temperature about 50 times colder than that of deep space, thanks to a refrigerator-size container of liquid helium.

This instrument will help astronomers unlock cosmic mysteries such as the chemical details of glowing hot gas inside galactic clusters.

“XRISM’s Resolve instrument will let us peer into the make-up of cosmic X-ray sources to a degree that hasn’t been possible before,” Kelley said. “We anticipate many new insights about the hottest objects in the universe, which include exploding stars, black holes and galaxies powered by them, and clusters of galaxies.”

Meanwhile, Xtend will provide XRISM with one of the largest fields of view on an X-ray satellite.

“The spectra XRISM collects will be the most detailed we’ve ever seen for some of the phenomena we’ll observe,” said Brian Williams, NASA’s XRISM project scientist at Goddard, in a statement. “The mission will provide us with insights into some of the most difficult places to study, like the internal structures of neutron stars and near-light-speed particle jets powered by black holes in active galaxies.”

Moon Sniper sets its sights on a crater

Meanwhile, SLIM will use its own propulsion system to head toward the moon. The spacecraft will arrive in lunar orbit about three to four months after launch, orbit the moon for one month, and begin its descent and attempt a soft landing between four to six months after launch. If the lander is successful, the technology demonstration will also briefly study the lunar surface.

Unlike other recent lander missions aiming for the lunar south pole, SLIM is targeting a site near a small lunar impact crater called Shioli, in the vicinity of the Sea of Nectar, where it will investigate the composition of rocks that may help scientists uncover the origins of the moon. The landing site is just south of the Sea of Tranquility, where Apollo 11 landed near the moon’s equator in 1969.

The Smart Lander for Investigating Moon flight model can be seen at Tanegashima Space Center. – JAXA

Following the United States, the former Soviet Union and China, India became the fourth country to execute a controlled landing on the moon when its Chandrayaan-3 mission arrived Wednesday near the lunar south pole. Previously, Japanese company Ispace’s Hakuto-R lunar lander fell 3 miles (4.8 kilometers) before crashing into the moon during a landing attempt in April.

The SLIM probe has vision-based navigation technology. Achieving precise landings on the moon is a key target for JAXA and other space agencies.

Resource-rich areas, such as the lunar south pole and its permanently shadowed regions filled with water ice, also present a number of hazards with craters and rocks. Future missions will need to be able to land within a narrow area to avoid these features.

SLIM also has a lightweight design that could be favorable as agencies plan more frequent missions and explore moons around other planets such as Mars. If SLIM is successful, JAXA contends, it will transform missions from “landing where we can to landing where we want.”

Copyright 2024 Reputation Poll Ltd. All Rights Reserved