Category: Communications

Facebook, and WhatsApp users experienced a rather strange disruption with their choice social media platforms. This caused a lot of panic which was widely expressed by vast users after the active return to normalcy.

On the event of this, the CEO of Facebook Mark Zuckerberg via his social handles, made open a letter to address the situation as he deemed it fit. Here’s the note below.

“I wanted to share a note I wrote to everyone at our company.

Hey everyone: it’s been quite a week, and I wanted to share some thoughts with all of you.

First, the SEV that took down all our services yesterday was the worst outage we’ve had in years. We’ve spent the past 24 hours debriefing how we can strengthen our systems against this kind of failure. This was also a reminder of how much our work matters to people. The deeper concern with an outage like this isn’t how many people switch to competitive services or how much money we lose, but what it means for the people who rely on our services to communicate with loved ones, run their businesses, or support their communities.

Second, now that today’s testimony is over, I wanted to reflect on the public debate we’re in. I’m sure many of you have found the recent coverage hard to read because it just doesn’t reflect the company we know. We care deeply about issues like safety, well-being and mental health. It’s difficult to see coverage that misrepresents our work and our motives. At the most basic level, I think most of us just don’t recognize the false picture of the company that is being painted.

Many of the claims don’t make any sense. If we wanted to ignore research, why would we create an industry-leading research program to understand these important issues in the first place? If we didn’t care about fighting harmful content, then why would we employ so many more people dedicated to this than any other company in our space — even ones larger than us? If we wanted to hide our results, why would we have established an industry-leading standard for transparency and reporting on what we’re doing? And if social media were as responsible for polarizing society as some people claim, then why are we seeing polarization increase in the US while it stays flat or declines in many countries with just as heavy use of social media around the world?

At the heart of these accusations is this idea that we prioritize profit over safety and well-being. That’s just not true. For example, one move that has been called into question is when we introduced the Meaningful Social Interactions change to News Feed. This change showed fewer viral videos and more content from friends and family — which we did knowing it would mean people spent less time on Facebook, but that research suggested it was the right thing for people’s well-being. Is that something a company focused on profits over people would do?

The argument that we deliberately push content that makes people angry for profit is deeply illogical. We make money from ads, and advertisers consistently tell us they don’t want their ads next to harmful or angry content. And I don’t know any tech company that sets out to build products that make people angry or depressed. The moral, business and product incentives all point in the opposite direction.

But of everything published, I’m particularly focused on the questions raised about our work with kids. I’ve spent a lot of time reflecting on the kinds of experiences I want my kids and others to have online, and it’s very important to me that everything we build is safe and good for kids.

The reality is that young people use technology. Think about how many school-age kids have phones. Rather than ignoring this, technology companies should build experiences that meet their needs while also keeping them safe. We’re deeply committed to doing industry-leading work in this area. A good example of this work is Messenger Kids, which is widely recognized as better and safer than alternatives.
Improves viagra samples vigor, vitality and strength. Modern busy life has made the life so much busy that we can’t make sex properly viagra properien discover for info and we feel frustrated when we can’t make our partner happy. Why do we have two of them? Surely we could breathe in more air in a single breath if we had just one, large nasal orifice cialis buy cialis (a “monostril”, perhaps)? The human body tends to be faced by a person when they generally fail to have proper erections while his love making session. He is the one who has to face unavailability levitra 20mg price of erection or difficulty in achieving an erection.

We’ve also worked on bringing this kind of age-appropriate experience with parental controls for Instagram too. But given all the questions about whether this would actually be better for kids, we’ve paused that project to take more time to engage with experts and make sure anything we do would be helpful.

Like many of you, I found it difficult to read the mischaracterization of the research into how Instagram affects young people. As we wrote in our Newsroom post explaining this: “The research actually demonstrated that many teens we heard from feel that using Instagram helps them when they are struggling with the kinds of hard moments and issues teenagers have always faced. In fact, in 11 of 12 areas on the slide referenced by the Journal — including serious areas like loneliness, anxiety, sadness and eating issues — more teenage girls who said they struggled with that issue also said Instagram made those difficult times better rather than worse.”

But when it comes to young people’s health or well-being, every negative experience matters. It is incredibly sad to think of a young person in a moment of distress who, instead of being comforted, has their experience made worse. We have worked for years on industry-leading efforts to help people in these moments and I’m proud of the work we’ve done. We constantly use our research to improve this work further.

Similar to balancing other social issues, I don’t believe private companies should make all of the decisions on their own. That’s why we have advocated for updated internet regulations for several years now. I have testified in Congress multiple times and asked them to update these regulations. I’ve written op-eds outlining the areas of regulation we think are most important related to elections, harmful content, privacy, and competition.

We’re committed to doing the best work we can, but at some level the right body to assess tradeoffs between social equities is our democratically elected Congress. For example, what is the right age for teens to be able to use internet services? How should internet services verify people’s ages? And how should companies balance teens’ privacy while giving parents visibility into their activity?

If we’re going to have an informed conversation about the effects of social media on young people, it’s important to start with a full picture. We’re committed to doing more research ourselves and making more research publicly available.

That said, I’m worried about the incentives that are being set here. We have an industry-leading research program so that we can identify important issues and work on them. It’s disheartening to see that work taken out of context and used to construct a false narrative that we don’t care. If we attack organizations making an effort to study their impact on the world, we’re effectively sending the message that it’s safer not to look at all, in case you find something that could be held against you. That’s the conclusion other companies seem to have reached, and I think that leads to a place that would be far worse for society. Even though it might be easier for us to follow that path, we’re going to keep doing research because it’s the right thing to do.

I know it’s frustrating to see the good work we do get mischaracterized, especially for those of you who are making important contributions across safety, integrity, research and product. But I believe that over the long term if we keep trying to do what’s right and delivering experiences that improve people’s lives, it will be better for our community and our business. I’ve asked leaders across the company to do deep dives on our work across many areas over the next few days so you can see everything that we’re doing to get there.

When I reflect on our work, I think about the real impact we have on the world — the people who can now stay in touch with their loved ones, create opportunities to support themselves, and find community. This is why billions of people love our products. I’m proud of everything we do to keep building the best social products in the world and grateful to all of you for the work you do here every day.”

Instagram head Adam Mosseri announced Monday that the company is “pausing the work” on Instagram Kids, an ad-free version of the photo sharing app intended for children under the age of 13 that has prompted a barrage of criticism since plans to build such a product were first reported back in March. “We’ll use this time to work with parents, experts and policymakers to demonstrate the value and need for this product” and “continue to build opt-in parental supervision tools for teens,” Mosseri wrote in an Instagram blog post, in which he seemed to at once acknowledge the need to put the plan on ice and dismiss reasonable conclusions one could draw from the company doing so. “Critics…will see this as an acknowledgement that the project is a bad idea. That’s not the case,” he claimed, noting “we’re not the only company” to see the need for such an experience. Rivals such as YouTube and TikTok have likewise developed “age-appropriate experiences” in response to “the reality…that kids are already online,” Mosseri wrote, points he reiterated in an interview with NBC’s Today.

Citing mental health and privacy concerns, lawmakers and more than 40 state attorneys generals were among those calling on Facebook—which owns Instagram—to scrap the project this spring. The company has continued to come under fire in recent weeks, amid damning reporting by the Wall Street Journal suggesting Facebook was aware of the harmful effects that Instagram had on teenage girls—it has been conducting studies into teen’s experiences on the app for the past three years—but publicly played down such internal research findings. “Expanding its base of young users is vital to the company’s more than $100 billion in annual revenue, and it doesn’t want to jeopardize their engagement with the platform,” the Journal noted—even if, as a slide summarizing internal research in 2019 concluded, “we make body image issues worse for one in three teen girls.”

Executives at the company—including Mosseri in Monday’s Today interview and blog post—have tried to discredit the Journal’s Facebook Files investigation by claiming the outlet mischaracterized its internal research, though Facebook has yet to release such findings in full. But in a Twitter thread Monday, Mosseri framed the Journal backlash as a kind of tipping point for reconsidering the youth service, and to Today’s Craig Melvin described features the company has been developing to address body image issues spotlighted by the Journal.
This drug is viagra without buy prescription designed and approved to be sold online. Anxiety can sometimes lead to pain in the muscles, fibrous tissues, veins, and arteries in and near the corpora cavernosa. check it right here now free viagra 100mg And besides, you dash your reputation to greyandgrey.com side effects from viagra the rocks with spamming. As a result you can enjoy fabulous love life and wipe sildenafil super out impotence in the UK and USA nations.

Later this week, Facebook is set to send global head of safety Antigone Davis to Washington to testify on kids’ safety before the Senate Commerce subcommittee on consumer protection, according to the Washington Post. Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle were outraged over the alleged whitewashing of Instagram’s toxicity, especially given Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s statement at a congressional hearing this year that “the research that we’ve seen is that using social apps to connect with other people can have positive mental-health benefits.” Senator Marsha Blackburn, the ranking member on the subcommittee, told the Post that the purported whistleblower behind the Facebook leaks has given her office and others on Capitol Hill “reams of documents” that were provided to the Journal. And according to a Blackburn aide, the whistleblower intends to go public by the end of the year—potentially by testifying before the consumer protection panel.